Free Admissibility & Citation Gap Briefing.Map your brand's footprint across the AI ecosystem and identify unverified Shadow Sources. Available for regulated enterprise evaluators.Secure Your Audit →
The BiDigest Control Plane

From Post-Mortem Monitoring to Real-Time Enforcement.

Traditional governance detects drift after the damage is done. BiDigest stops inadmissible AI actions at the execution boundary—before they become operational facts.

The Visibility Gap

Monitoring tools tell you what went wrong yesterday. By then, the regulatory breach is already on the ledger.

The Execution Gap

AI models drift. Cloud state changes. BiDigest intercepts in <50ms to ensure every action is still authorized at the moment of commit.

The Admissibility Gap

Without Merkle-sealed proof, an AI action is legally indefensible. We provide the WORM-compliant evidence required for audit.

Not a Wrapper.
A Synchronous Intercept.

Wrappers and filters are suggestive — they sit outside the execution path. BiDigest performs a Structural Intercept on the wire. We don't trust the AI; we hold the commit.

Zero-Trust Execution
The 50ms Wall (Synchronous)
Inadmissibility Neutralization

"We don't try to make the AI safer. We make the infrastructure incapable of executing a breach."

Control Plane Status
ACTIVE_ENFORCEMENT
INTENT_CAPTURET+12ms
IFQ_CALCULATIONT+34ms
COMMIT_BOUNDARYFAIL_CLOSED

The Execution Graph

Dual-boundary governance in one linear path—from Ground Truth upstream to the commit boundary downstream.

Pipeline diagram: Ground Truth through IFQ engine to commit boundary and admissibility receipt
1

1. Lock the Standard

We ingest your regulatory identifiers, statutory anchors, and hard corporate policies—encrypting them into an immutable Ground Truth baseline.
2

2. Catch the Intent

We intercept the AI payload on the wire—not a wrapper, but a structural gate. Every emission is treated as an unverified intent until proven otherwise.
3

3. Enforce Consensus

In under 50 milliseconds, the system demands a deterministic Triple-Lock (cryptographic sign-off from Legal, Risk, and Engineering).
4

4. Zero Liability

If the math isn't perfect, the action is blocked. You get a Merkle-sealed receipt for the audit—proving the "Why" behind every "Yes" or "No".

The IFQ Engine

We do not rely on probabilistic LLM "safety" prompts. Admissibility is a mathematical certainty. The Identity Fidelity Quotient (IFQ) is calculated at the execution boundary.

Patent pending — US Prov. App. No. 63/XXXXX

Translation for the Board

"If the AI uses the wrong source or violates a structural contract, the score drops to zero and the gate closes. No exceptions."

Identity (A — Anchor)

Matches the payload against hard tokens from your Ground Truth. We rely on statutory anchors, not paraphrased blog summaries, to drive what the gate may admit.

Structure (S — Schema)

Ensures requests and payloads satisfy structural contracts at the boundary. “Valid JSON” cannot be used to mask invalid regulatory obligations.

Citation & fidelity (C × F)

Enforces citation integrity. Shadow Sources (outdated or rogue URLs) must be on your allow-list. Fidelity (F) acts as the multiplier, mathematically tying the output tokens back to the anchored reference text. A “right answer” from the “wrong source” yields an IFQ of zero.

Merkle-Chained Forensics

This receipt is the only document that survives an SEC or Bank of England forensic audit. It proves the "Why" behind every "Yes" or "No".

  • Tamper-Proof Ledger

    A SHA-256 hashed record of the exact AI payload and the Ground Truth anchor.

  • Audit Ready

    Export the enforcement path for insurers, the SEC, or PRA supervisors.

RECEIPT_ID0xabc123...

{

"phase": "EXECUTE",

"ifq_score": 0.97,

"anchor_id": "GDPR-Art-32",

"merkle_root": "0xdef456...",

"status": "ADMITTED"

}

WORM COMPLIANT STORAGE

Ready to Hardent the Boundary?

Stop monitoring the damage. Start enforcing the standard. Deploy the BiDigest Control Plane in under 15 minutes.

Sovereign KB · IFQ · per-LLM — ask here